Though a court quickly tossed out Simonds’s victory, and she eventually ended up conceding to her Republican opponent, it’s not the only time an election came down to a single ballot. Though a one-vote win is rare, it has happened before. On more than one occasion. Here are 10 other elections where every vote really did count. United States House of Representatives elections occur more frequently every two years with more seats since , with between and than any other electable federal office in the country. So it only makes sense there would be more close House calls than those for President, where Bush squeezed by Gore in Florida by a certified count of in , or the U. S Senate, where a two-vote margin led to a revote in a New Hampshire election.

Dating deception: Gender, online dating, and exaggerated self

Human match-making is a complicated process that likely dates back to the bible. However, the prevalence of online dating has arguably changed the landscape, as people are better able to curate what they share and how they present themselves online. Want to share this image on your site? Just copy and paste the embed code below: Tinder, a mobile dating app, has a reputation for facilitating hook-ups based primarily on appearance.

This is likely because the app gives users very little information other than geographic proximity, name, age and — of course — photos.

Nov 01,  · Hi pmccray – online dating is a great way to find a mate, but having been stung badly in the past it got me thinking about the mechanics of what went wrong from a psychological perspective and a lot of it is expressed s:

They are also more vulnerable and less inhibited in their communication than adults and therefore may become exposed to risks. The use of social networking sites has been the focus of a large number of research studies. The NPW research project aimed to investigate the use of social networking sites across the age range. Eighty-six per cent of survey participants reported that they currently use online social networking sites.

A breakdown of users and non-users by age group is presented in Figure 1. There was little variation on the sites used across the age groups, with Facebook being the primary online social networking site across all ages. There was a decrease in the number of online friends with increasing age, with those aged below 30 reporting an average friends, those aged 31 to 50 reporting an average friends, and those over 50 having an average of 92 friends the average overall was reported as friends.

Of the non-users, 29 per cent reported previously using online social networking sites. Frequency of online social networking use The research project also sought to investigate popular concerns about excessive use of social networking sites, particularly among younger users.

The Ugly Truth About Online Dating

Close Online dating doesn’t have the stigma it once had. Alamy Online dating used to be a bit, well, embarrassing. Browsing love-match sites was something to be done late at night, at home, when no one could see.

As online dating matures, however, it is likely that more and more people will avail themselves of these services, and if development — and use — of these sites is guided by rigorous psychological science, they may become a more promising way for people to meet their perfect partners.

Share on Messenger Close Friends give a thumbs up or thumbs down to fellow users of the Tinder app. Karen Robinson If you are a romantic, you are probably not on Tinder, the latest big addition to the online dating world. Tinder is the aptly named heterosexual version of Grindr, an older hook-up app that identifies available gay, bisexual, or “curious” partners in the vicinity. It is also the modern blend of hot-or-not, in that users are required to judge pictures from fellow Tinderers by simply swiping right if they like them or left if they don’t, and s telephone bars, in that phone flirting precedes face-to-face interaction.

Thus Tinder is hardly original, yet it has taken the mobile dating market by storm: More importantly, and in stark contrast with the overwhelmingly negative media reception, Tinder has managed to overcome the two big hurdles to online dating. First, Tinder is cool, at least to its users. Indeed, whereas it is still somewhat embarrassing to confess to using EHarmony or Match. Second, through eliminating time lags and distance, Tinder bridges the gap between digital and physical dating, enabling users to experience instant gratification and making Tinder almost as addictive as Facebook the average user is on it minutes per day.

But the bigger lessons from the Tinder effect are psychological. Let me offer a few here: In our technosexual era, the process of dating has not only been gamified, but also sexualised, by technology. Mobile dating is much more than a means to an end, it is an end in itself. With Tinder, the pretext is to hook-up, but the real pleasure is derived from the Tindering process.

Society for the Teaching of Psychology

This fast growing social phenomenon has caught the attention of many cognitive psychologists and sociologists across the country who have begun to study the online dating experience in an attempt to understand how it impacts human behavior and affects social norms. More specifically, many researchers are using science to dispel the myths and uncover the truths about digital dating.

Jeremy Dean, a psychologist and author of PsyBlog , addresses these myths in his article entitled, Online Dating: Current research seems to fly in the face of the stereotype that online daters are socially inept loners that lack social skills and ambition. In actuality, various studies seem to indicate that online daters are often highly social and use the Internet as a convenient way to meet people often after moving to a new city, working long hours, or lacking the time to meet someone new at a more conventional place such as a bar Kim et al, Honesty seems to prevail in the profile of online daters.

Online dating could have been made for older adults – they love it Most popular on The Conversation years later, the madness of daylight saving time endures.

Somewhere between one-third and three-quarters of single people with internet access have used it to try and meet someone new. The truth is somewhere in between, but where? So, here are my 10 favourite psychological insights on internet dating. In fact, quite the reverse. Internet daters are more likely to be sociable, have high self-esteem and be low in dating anxiety Kim et al.

When this data was compared with their profiles, it showed that nine out of ten had lied on at least one of the attributes measured, but the lies were only small ones. Daters were more truthful about their age 1. As expected women tended to shave off the pounds, while men gave themselves a boost in height.

Cupid on Trial: An Online Dating Experiment

What first made you attracted to that individual? Is it because they have a friendly personality, a positive attitude or even good looks? If you are single, think of your good friends. How did you become good friends with these people? In the branch of social psychology, there are many theories and principles that illustrate why certain people “fall in love” with each other or why certain people interact and become friends.

According to the interpersonal attraction principle, social psychologists have identified several major factors that influence interpersonal attraction which is anything that draws two or more people together characterized by affection, respect, liking, or love “Interpersonal attraction,”

But is dating online that different from the traditional methods on a psychological level? 20 percent of heterosexual couples and 70 percent of same-sex couples met on the internet.

Social influence Social influence is an overarching term given to describe the persuasive effects people have on each other. It is seen as a fundamental value in social psychology and overlaps considerably with research on attitudes and persuasion. The three main areas of social influence include: Social influence is also closely related to the study of group dynamics, as most principles of influence are strongest when they take place in social groups.

The first major area of social influence is conformity. Conformity is defined as the tendency to act or think like other members of a group. The identity of members within a group, i. Individual variation among group members plays a key role in the dynamic of how willing people will be to conform.

Small Research Grant Program

Many people search for love on online dating sites, and why should psychologists be any different? We also want to meet people for activities, dating, and romance. Sometimes, looking for love online is good way to get outside of our usual social circles without going to bars or singles events. But having an online dating profile can also pose challenges to clinicians who worry how it may affect clients, students, or supervisees to see them putting their hopes and hearts into prose while searching for intimacy on the Internet.

There is literature focusing upon the challenges of running into clients or trainees in the offline world but online personal ads can reveal a lot more intimate information to those who stumble onto your profile than would be typically revealed by showing up at the same event. If your clients, students, or supervisors are in a similar age group as your dating pool, it may only be a matter of time before these online encounters occur.

XXX/Finkel et Dating Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science Eli J. Finkel Research Article Summary Online dating sites frequently claim that they have fundamentally altered the dating landscape for the better. This article employs psychological science to examine.

Yet in many situations, even in the hard sciences, it is the most useful means of all. The value of intuition is underplayed in many areas of life, nowhere less so than in online dating. Most dating websites are engines of algorithmic-powered rationality. It is slow, deliberative and analytical, a product of our relatively recently evolved prefrontal cortex; it enables us to make complex computations, and to direct our attention at particular tasks. System 1, by contrast, is fast, automatic and emotion-led, driven by far older neural circuits; it operates automatically and with little sense of agency.

System 1 is intuition. Effective decision-making requires both systems — but sometimes it is better to use one over the other. In the real offline world, sussing out a potential partner is — at least in the beginning — indisputably a system 1 activity. Humans are remarkably adept at navigating complex social worlds and instinctively picking up on familiar signs that might indicate compatibility. This is intuition in over-drive. Curious, then, that this is exactly what many dating sites compel us to do.

Thinking carefully about our dream date, and about our own personality, and allowing an algorithm to compute a match, may be an intriguing exercise.

15 of American adults use online dating sites or mobile apps

Early research suggests that men present themselves as wealthier, taller, and with more hair. Women, on the other hand, are thought to present themselves as blonder, thinner, and bustier. In effect the early research suggests that men and women have beliefs about what prospective dates want and they present themselves in a way that matches. This is particularly an issue for heterosexual men as heterosexual women get approximately six times more contacts than do men.

Have you ever wondered about the psychology of online dating? If so, you’ve come to the right place! Human match-making is a complicated process that likely dates back to the bible.

Advertisement Every day, millions of single adults, worldwide, visit an online dating site. Many are lucky, finding life-long love or at least some exciting escapades. Others are not so lucky. The industry—eHarmony, Match, OkCupid, and a thousand other online dating sites—wants singles and the general public to believe that seeking a partner through their site is not just an alternative way to traditional venues for finding a partner, but a superior way.

With our colleagues Paul Eastwick, Benjamin Karney, and Harry Reis, we recently published a book-length article in the journal Psychological Science in the Public Interest that examines this question and evaluates online dating from a scientific perspective. We also conclude, however, that online dating is not better than conventional offline dating in most respects, and that it is worse is some respects.

As the stigma of dating online has diminished over the past 15 years, increasing numbers of singles have met romantic partners online. Indeed, in the U. Of course, many of the people in these relationships would have met somebody offline, but some would still be single and searching. Indeed, the people who are most likely to benefit from online dating are precisely those who would find it difficult to meet others through more conventional methods, such as at work, through a hobby, or through a friend.

Singles browse profiles when considering whether to join a given site, when considering whom to contact on the site, when turning back to the site after a bad date, and so forth. The answer is simple: A series of studies spearheaded by our co-author Paul Eastwick has shown that people lack insight regarding which characteristics in a potential partner will inspire or undermine their attraction to him or her see here , here , and here. The straightforward solution to this problem is for online dating sites to provide singles with the profiles of only a handful of potential partners rather than the hundreds or thousands of profiles that many sites provide.

Evidence Based Dating Strategies

Edit While the date is fairly casual in most European cultures, in many traditional societies, courtship is a highly structured activity, with very specific formal rules. In some societies, the parents or community propose potential partners, and then allow limited dating to determine whether the parties are suited. In Japan , there is a type of courtship called Omiai.

The matchmaker and parents will often exert pressure on the couple to decide whether they want to marry or not after a few dates. In more closed societies, courtship is virtually eliminated altogether by the practice of arranged marriages , where partners are chosen for young people, typically by their parents.

Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13 (1), DOI: / Gosling, S. (). Snoop: What your stuff says about you.

A collection of measures of religiosity and related areas. Includes the tests, reviews, validity and reliability information. A collection of Physical Activity Questionnaires for health-related research. M44 A collection of questionnaires to measure physical activity. Lists, descriptions, and references to measures Mental Measurements Yearbook aka Buros mental measurements yearbook The comprehensive source for test reviews. Organized alphabetically by measure title.

Indexes measures by title, title acronym, subject, and authors. Tests in Print Describes what the test is useful for Provides information on how to acquire the test Indexes test by titles, subject, author, acronyms Tests: Indexed by test title, author, publisher, as well as by tests for the hearing impaired. Great book for general review of psychology, education, business.

Test Critiques Indexed by author, publisher, subject. Had reliability and validity information, and a critique of the test. Does not include the test. Handbook of multicultural assessment Useful when studying cultural differences or cultural biases.

Inside OKCupid: The math of online dating – Christian Rudder